Cochlear implants raise many controversial issues in
today’s society. After thinking over what I would do if I had a child that was
born deaf, I decided that I would give my child the implant. Many people may
not agree with this choice, but I believe it would be the best for the child in
today’s world. One
of the reasons I think that these would be more beneficial to a child than just
a hearing aid or no help at all is because in the world today the deaf
community is becoming less and less prominent. It would be hard to find quality
education for children who need to be signed to. Heather’s parents had to move
cities just to find a school that would accommodate her deafness. Not every
family is able to relocate to find a deaf school. The implant gives the child
the opportunity to live like every other child, but still embrace deafness. I also feel like they would not fit in
with the community. Not many people know how to sign, and the few that do, are
scattered. I believe it would be hard to communicate with those who do not know
sign language. I still believe, however, that a child who is born deaf should
be taught sign language. This will help to keep the deaf community alive. Deaf
people who chose not to get the implant don’t want their community of deaf
people to go extinct. They want to know why hearing people have a problem with
people being deaf. I don’t think that people necessarily have a problem with
people who are deaf, I just think that the world is changing and today’s
lifestyle doesn’t accommodate for deafness as well as it did in the past.
I would
also want to give my child every opportunity that he or she could ever want. It
is sometimes not reasonable to have an interpreter by your side for every
action done at your job. The economy is tight today, and employers are looking
to hire the least amount of people possible. Hiring a deaf person would most
likely mean hiring an interpreter for that person as well. However, then the
company would have to pay two people instead of one. I am not saying that
employers would always discriminate against the deaf. I just think that it
would be more of a hassle, and people today want to go the
easy route.
If I were to implant my child I would have a few
criteria that I would follow. First, I would implant them at a young age so
that they have the best chance of speaking. It is also easier to learn language
at a younger age. The deaf community, however, is worried that kids with speech
only focus on speaking, not signing. I can see where they are coming from. I
personally find that to be true. It is hard to learn how to speak and sign at
the same time. The brain will get confused. That is why I propose that you
implant the child at a young age and let their speech develop nicely. Then,
when they have mastered having the implant, teach them sign language to let
them know what kind of community they are also a part of. Teach them about the
condition that they were born with. That way the language of signing can be
kept alive, and those who are against the implant can still feel like they can
function normally.
I can fully understand where the people of the deaf
culture are coming from. I, too, would be offended if my child was born deaf,
like me, and wanted to get the implant. I would wonder if I wasn’t good enough
for him or her. I would also be offended that hearing people would think that I
couldn’t find work that was suitable for me. I understand all of their
concerns. However, I feel like for a child to be born deaf in today’s world, he
or she would struggle. He or she would struggle socially as well as
academically. I would certainly consider leaving my child deaf in we lived in a
different world. There are just too many people going to implants that sign
language is becoming less known and harder to come by. With these reasons in
mind, I would choose to have my child implanted.